Search toggle

What's our vision?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What kind of facilities do we have?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What's our working hours?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

Real Briefings

Bellingham City Council

WHA-CON-SPC-2026-05-18 May 18, 2026 Committee of the Whole Whatcom County 8 min
← Back to All Briefings
May
Month
18
Day
8
Min
Published
Status

The Bellingham City Council convened a special meeting on May 18, 2026, for a single agenda item: a closed record hearing on Agenda Bill 24940, an ordinance to vacate the eastern half (15 feet) of Fir Street abutting the western 110 feet of Block 13, Silver Heights Addition to Whatcom, in Bellingham, Whatcom County, Washington. The meeting lasted approximately eight minutes and concluded with a unanimous 5-0 vote (two members excused) to approve the ordinance on first and second reading. Deputy City Attorney James Erb presented the item, confirming that all procedural prerequisites under the Bellingham Municipal Code had been satisfied. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) had previously forwarded a favorable recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, who held a hybrid public hearing on April 15, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers. The Hearing Examiner received public testimony, found that all five criteria in the Bellingham Municipal Code were satisfied, and recommended approval. The petitioner — identified by Council President Hannah Stone as Miriam Stone — remitted the full fair market appraised value of the right-of-way on March 13, 2026. The agenda bill identifies that amount as $44,000. Council President Stone noted on the record that the petitioner shares her last name but is not a known relation. The only outstanding condition attached to the Hearing Examiner's approval recommendation involves the negotiation of an easement to preserve city access to a stormwater cleanout located approximately mid-block within the portion of the right-of-way proposed for vacation. Public Works confirmed the cleanout is a small, pedestrian-access-only facility (approximately 3 feet by 5 feet) requiring no vehicle access. The parties had not yet finalized easement language at the time of this meeting. Because the easement language remains unresolved, staff indicated the third and final reading of the ordinance would be held at a subsequent meeting, pending agreement

**AB 24940 — Street Vacation Ordinance, First and Second Reading** - **Item:** Ordinance relating to the vacation of the eastern one-half (15 feet) of Fir Street abutting the western 110 feet of Block 13, Silver Heights Addition to Whatcom, Bellingham, Whatcom County, Washington. - **Staff Recommendation:** Approve on first and second reading. (Third and final reading to be held at a subsequent meeting, after easement language is negotiated.) - **Council Action:** Approved on first and second reading. Motion by Council Member Lisa Anderson; seconded by Council Member …

About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Street Vacation — Fir Street Partial Right-of-Way** A street vacation is a legal process by which a municipal government relinquishes its ownership of a public right-of-way, transferring title to the abutting property owner(s). Under state law and the Bellingham Municipal Code, street vacation petitions must satisfy specific criteria before the City Council may approve them. In this case, Deputy City Attorney James Erb confirmed that the Technical Review Committee had reviewed the petition and forwarded a favorable recommendation to the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner conducted a hybrid public hearing on April 15, 2026, and found that all five criteria in the Bellingham Municipal Code were satisfied: 1. The vacation is in the public interest. 2. The subject right-of-way is not currently necessary for transportation or other right-of-way purposes, nor is it likely to be in the future. 3. No existing parcel, lot of record, or tract will be denied access as a result of the vacation. 4. Criterion four was found inapplicable. 5. Criterion five was found inapplicable. The sole condition attached to the Hearing Examiner's recommendation is the reservation of an easem…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Council President Hannah Stone** (presiding): Noted one question in advance — whether there was an update on coordination between the petitioner and Public Works regarding the easement. Received the answer (resolution pending at third and final reading). Also disclosed on the record that the petitioner shares her last name but is not a known relation. Noted the item "seems straightforward." Directed staff and the Clerk to flag the easement issue before the third and final reading. **Council Member Lisa Anderson** (questioned; moved): Asked about the nature of the stormwater cleanout access requirement — specifically whether large equipment such as a vactor truck would be needed, or whether simpler hand access would suffice. After receiving clarification that no vehicle access is required, moved to approve the ordinance. **Council Member Edwin H. "Skip" Williams** (seconded): Asked a clarifying question about the s…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Deputy City Attorney James Erb, on procedural status:** "All of the necessary procedural prerequisites have been satisfied in this case." **Erb, on the Hearing Examiner's findings:** "The hearing examiner held the property noticed hearing on this request for a street vacation and found that all five criteria in the Bellingham Municipal Code are satisfied." **Erb, on the reason for deferring third and final reading:** "We will be holding a third and final reading until some language can be…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

- **Third and Final Reading of AB 24940:** Expected at the next regular City Council meeting, contingent on the petitioner and Public Works reaching agreement on the stormwater easement language. No specific date was given. Council President Stone directed the City Clerk to flag this item prior to the third and final reading. - **Easement Negotiation:** City Public Works and the petitioner (Miriam Stone) must negotiate and finalize easement langu…

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Before this meeting:** AB 24940 had cleared the Technical Review Committee and the Hearing Examiner process but had not been acted upon by the City Council. The street vacation ordinance had not yet been read or voted on. **After this meeting:** The City Council has approved the ordinance on first and second reading by a 5-0 vote. The $44,000 payment by t…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing