Search toggle

What's our vision?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What kind of facilities do we have?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What's our working hours?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

Real Briefings

Whatcom County Council

WHA-CON-SPC-2026-05-05 May 05, 2026 Committee of the Whole Whatcom County 34 min
← Back to All Briefings
May
Month
05
Day
34
Min
Published
Status

The Whatcom County Council held a tense special meeting to consider AB 2026-340, a resolution establishing budget parameters for the proposed county jail and behavioral care center. The session revealed deep divisions between the Council and key stakeholders, including mayors from all seven cities, law enforcement officials, and County Executive Satpal Sidhu. The meeting began with Councilmember John Scanlon presenting a revised substitute resolution that had been distributed to council members only the night before. The resolution aimed to establish a $205 million budget cap for jail construction, affirm commitments to investing 50% of project funds in community services, and set conditions for debt authorization. However, the meeting quickly became contentious when Executive Sidhu delivered a scathing 10-minute critique, calling the resolution "not grounded in reality" and "utterly divisive." He stated he would remove his staff from the project and refused to put his name on what he called "a project which is designed to fail." His remarks set the tone for what became an increasingly fractured discussion. Five mayors attended the meeting after disbanding their own scheduled meeting to address the council. They expressed feeling "unheard" and raised serious concerns about signing a new interlocal agreement under the proposed terms. The mayors, led by Mayor Kim Lund of Bellingham and supported by the mayors of Ferndale, Everson, Blaine, and Lynden, emphasized their primary responsibility for public safety and the need for a "right-sized" jail without booking restrictions. Sheriff Donnell Tanksley echoed these concerns, stating that "the goalpost changes week by week, year by year, now day by day" and questioning why his input as the elected official responsible for jail operations wasn't being sought on key decisions. Police Chief Rebecca Meredith of Bellingham and Police Chief Roger Funk of Blaine provided additional testimony about the real-world impacts of cu

**Motion 1 - Amendment to Lobbying and Funding Language (Passed 6-1)** - **Action:** Amended substitute resolution to split funding recommendations into two separate bullet points - **Vote:** Boyle, Buchanan, Elenbaas, Galloway, Rienstra, Scanlon voted yes; Stremler voted no - **Key Details:** Separated requests for IPRTF to study additional funding sources (including LaBounty Road property sale proceeds) from requests for executive to coordinate state/federal lobbying efforts - **Legal Addition:** Added "as permitted by law" language to address lobbying regulation concerns **Motion 2 - Strike 50% Floor Contingency (Passed 7-0)** - **Action:** Removed bullet point requiring alternative jail size if 50% service …

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
The core policy debate centered on balancing jail infrastructure needs with community service investments, commonly referred to as the "50/50" split between facilities and services. The proposed resolution attempted to codify the Council's commitment to investing half of all project resources in diversion, behavioral health, and reentry programs while establishing parameters for jail construction. Councilmember Scanlon defended the resolution as setting reasonable conditions before authorizing debt, emphasizing that "we're building a new jail" while ensuring adequate service investments. The resolution sought to count the $34 million behavioral care center as part of the services commitment, which Scanlon argued helps achieve the 50% target. However, stakeholders raised fundamental concerns about the approach. Executive Sidhu characterized the resolution as creating unrealistic expectations and micromanaging the project team. He argued that the Council's demands would make the project unworkable and expressed frustration with what he saw as constant changes in direction. The mayors focused on their core responsibility for public safety, with Mayor Greg Hanson of Fernda…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**County Executive Satpal Sidhu:** Delivered harsh criticism of the resolution, calling it "not grounded in reality" and "utterly divisive." Stated he would direct staff to provide information without recommendations and remove himself from project leadership, saying "I do not want to be part of this project which is doomed to fail because of the council's interference." **Mayor Kim Lund (Bellingham):** Emphasized mayors' responsibility to uphold laws requiring adequate jail capacity. Noted the $34 million behavioral care center represents a significant services investment not fully recognized in 50/50 discussions. Called for "political courage" to make necessary decisions while expressing concern about signing an interlocal agreement with uncertain jail sizing. **Mayor Greg Hanson (Ferndale):** Advocated for "facility first" approach, arguing that infrastructure is the most difficult hurdle to overcome. Stated Ferndale would struggle to sign an interlocal agreement without guarantees against future booking restrictions, emphasizing the need to build for 30-50 year service life. **Mayor John Perry (Everson):** Noted 17 years of jail capacity discussions and emphasized mayors' primary responsibility for public safety. Described daily cost-based decisions cities make about jail usage ($200/day) and the business reality of curr…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**County Executive Satpal Sidhu, on the resolution's feasibility:** "This resolution is not grounded in reality. It's a excellent effort to be paper perfect, but when it comes to implementing I don't think I have any confidence that it can be implemented." **County Executive Satpal Sidhu, on his role going forward:** "I do not want to be part of this project which is doomed to fail because of the council's interference. The council is making this thing to fail." **Mayor Kim Lund, on mayoral …
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

**May 12th, 2026 - Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee Meeting:** The held resolution will be reconsidered, with opportunity for additional amendments and stakeholder input. **Spring 2027 - First Bond Issuance:** Projected timeline for first debt authorization, contingent on Council approval of project parameters. **Immediate Stakeholder Feedback Period:** Council requested written feedback from mayors, sheriff, and executive's office on revised resolution language. **Inter…

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Resolution Structure Modified:** Two amendments altered the substitute resolution - separating funding study requests from lobbying coordination and removing contingency language about reduced jail size if 50% service funding cannot be achieved. **Project Leadership Crisis:** County Executive's withdrawal of support and staff represents significant change in project governance structure and working relationships. **Stakeholder Coalition Formation:** Mayors from five of seven cities presented unified position opposing current Council approach, representing new level of organized resistance to proposed parameters. **Timeline Extended Again:** Ano…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
# When Compromise Crumbles — A Special Session on the Jail Crisis The Whatcom County Council convened on a gray Tuesday morning in May 2026, the kind of day when Bellingham's overcast skies seemed to mirror the mood inside the county courthouse. This was no ordinary meeting — it was a special session called to hash out one of the most contentious issues facing the county: how to build a new jail without tearing apart the fragile coalition that had finally agreed to fund it. Seven council members took their seats at 8:46 a.m., each carrying the weight of months of heated debate, shifting coalitions, and mounting pressure from constituents who wanted both public safety and progressive criminal justice reform. In the gallery and on video screens, mayors from across Whatcom County waited to speak, along with the sheriff, police chiefs, and County Executive Satpal Sidhu — all stakeholders in a project that seemed to fracture a little more with each passing meeting. At stake was Resolution AB 2026-340, a document that would establish budget caps and governing principles for building both a new county jail and a behavioral care center. What had begun as a collaborative effort to replace an aging, overcrowded jail had devolved into a battle over fundamental questions: How big should the new facility be? How much should be spent on incarceration versus treatment and prevention programs? And perhaps most importantly — who gets to decide? ## The Resolution That Changed Everything Council Member John Scanlon rose to present the latest version of the resolution, a substitute dated May 5th that council members had received just the night before. Working with colleagues Jessica Rienstra and Elizabeth Boyle, Scanlon had incorporated elements from Barry Buchanan's earlier work while adding new provisions that reflected community input and ongoing discussions with other elected officials. "One of the goals that we're trying to get to here is making sure that before authorizing debt, we're fully aware of all the potential consequences and outcomes," Scanlon explained, walking through the changes. The re…
About 14% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
### Meeting Overview The Whatcom County Council held a special meeting on May 5, 2026 to discuss a revised resolution establishing planning guidelines and budget parameters for the county's jail and behavioral care center project. The meeting centered on AB 2026-340, a resolution setting a preliminary budget cap and providing recommendations to the administration on the capital construction project. ### Key Terms and Concepts **Substitute Resolution:** A revised version of the original resolution, incorporating changes and amendments suggested by council members and stakeholders. **50% Floor:** A requirement that 50% of the criminal justice tax revenue be dedicated to services, programs, and behavioral health initiatives rather than just jail construction. **Behavioral Care Center (BCC):** A new $34 million out-of-custody facility planned for the Division Street campus to provide mental health and behavioral services as an alternative to incarceration. **Design-Build Team:** The contracted team (STV) responsible for designing and constructing the jail facility. **Interlocal Agreement (ILA):** The agreement between Whatcom County and its seven cities outlining how costs and responsibilities for the jail project will be shared. **IPRTF (Incarceration Prevention and Reduction Task Force):** A multi-jurisdictional body that developed recommendations for criminal justice reform and jail alternatives. **Debt Authorization:** The formal approval process required before the county can issue bonds to finance the jail construction project. **Booking Restrictions:** Limitations on accepting new inmates when jail capacity is reached, often resulting in arrested individuals being released immediately. ### Key People at This Meeting | Name | Role / Affiliation | |---|---| | Kaylee Galloway | Council Chair | | Jon Scanlon | Council Member, Motion Sponsor | | Jessica Rienstra | Council Member | | Elizabeth Boyle | Council Member | | Ben Elenbaas | Council Member | | Mark Stremler | Council Member | | Barry Buchanan | Council Member | | Satpal Sidhu | County Executive | | Seth Fleetwood | Mayor of Bellingham | | Greg Hansen | Mayor of Ferndale | | Scott Kortheis | Mayor of Lynden | | Mary Lou Ste…
About 49% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing