Search toggle
Donate
Search toggle
Donate
What are you looking for?

What's our vision?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What kind of facilities do we have?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What's our working hours?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

Real Briefings

Whatcom County Council

WHA-CON-SPC-2026-03-31 March 31, 2026 Committee of the Whole Whatcom County 23 min
← Back to All Briefings
Mar
Month
31
Day
23
Min
Published
Status

Whatcom County Council held a brief special meeting Tuesday morning, passing one ordinance unanimously and holding another item for future consideration. The 23-minute session focused primarily on legal matters related to employee defense and a potential criminal justice sales tax. Council unanimously approved AB2026-233, an ordinance amending county code to allow recovery of legal defense costs if employees are later found to have acted outside their official duties. Council Member Ben Elenbaas, who brought the proposal forward, explained it provides the county with recourse to recoup defense investments when court proceedings determine employees weren't acting in good faith or within their job scope. The second item, AB2026-257 regarding criminal justice sales tax priorities, was held until April 14th to coincide with public hearings on related tax proposals. Council Member Jon Scanlon requested the delay to allow comprehensive discussion of multiple tax options simultaneously. Technical difficulties with Council Member Elenbaas's remote connection interrupted portions of the discussion, though all members were able to participate in voting. The meeting adjourned promptly to accommodate a scheduled health board meeting at 10:00 AM.

**AB2026-233 - Employee Defense and Indemnification Amendment** - **Vote:** 7-0 (Unanimous approval) - **Staff Recommendation:** Not specified in source documents - **Action:** Approved ordinance amending Whatcom County Code Chapter 2.56 - **Key Specifics:** Adds "reservation of rights and reimbursement" language allowing county to recover legal defense costs if employees are found to have acted outside official capacity - **Practical Impact:** Provides county recourse to recoup legal investments when court finds em…

About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Employee Defense Indemnification Reform** Council Member Elenbaas explained the rationale for AB2026-233, noting that while most legal defense cases go through the Washington State risk pool, some remain in-house based on specific criteria. The county typically provides defense assuming employees acted in good faith within their job duties. The new language would allow cost recovery if court proceedings later determine otherwise. Attorney Kimberly Tilling noted the risk pool had suggested adding clarifying language to specify the ordinance applies only to matters "independent of the risk pool," but Council ultimately decided the existing language in subsection E was sufficient. Council Member Scanlon raised questions about scenarios where the coun…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
No public testimony was taken during this special meeting. The only stakeholder input referenced was feedback from the Washington State risk pool regarding preferred clarifying language for the employ…
About 78% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Ben Elenbaas, on employee defense ordinance purpose:** "If in the course of a court proceeding, basically that a judge finds that that wasn't the case, then the county would then have the ability to try and recoup the investment that we made in that defense." **Ben Elenbaas, on risk pool language concerns:** "Sometimes it's, you say more by saying less. Because I do think I remember a time, like Council Member Scanlon was saying that county legal argued the case, but it was still like throu…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

**April 14, 2026:** Public hearing scheduled on criminal justice tax options, including discussion of AB2026-257 resolution. Council indicated interest in executive session that morning to discuss legal advice received on related ordinances. **Morning of April 7, 2026:** Deadline for any amendments t…

About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
After this meeting, Whatcom County Code Chapter 2.56 now includes reservation of rights and reimbursement provisions, allowing the county to recover legal defense costs when employees are found to have acted outside their official capacity or in bad faith. AB2026-257 criminal justice tax priorities reso…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
# When Technical Issues Meet Policy Priorities: A Morning at Whatcom County Council ## Meeting Overview On a crisp Tuesday morning, March 31st, 2026, the seven-member Whatcom County Council convened for a special meeting designed to be brief but consequential. Meeting in hybrid format at 9:32 AM in the County Courthouse chambers, all council members were present: Elizabeth Boyle, Barry Buchanan, Ben Elenbaas, Kaylee Galloway, Jessica Rienstra, John Scanlon, and Mark Stremler. The agenda was lean—just two items for discussion and action—but the meeting would reveal both the mundane mechanics of local government and the complex dynamics surrounding a significant new tax proposal. The session was scheduled to adjourn by 9:55 AM to allow for a 10 AM health board meeting, creating an atmosphere of efficiency tinged with urgency. What unfolded was a study in contrasts: the first item moved with remarkable speed and consensus, while the second became entangled in procedural questions and strategic positioning around a multimillion-dollar criminal justice tax that has captured the council's attention for weeks. As Council Member Ben Elenbaas would find himself participating from his car, stuck in Ferndale traffic with spotty cell service, the meeting became an inadvertent demonstration of the challenges facing modern governance in an increasingly connected but sometimes unreliable digital world. ## The Defense and Indemnification Amendment The meeting's first substantive business was AB 2026-233, an ordinance amending Whatcom County Code Chapter 2.56 regarding defense and indemnification of employees. Council Member John Scanlon quickly moved to approve, with Elizabeth Boyle providing the second, setting the stage for what appeared to be routine business. But Elizabeth Boyle paused the proceedings, acknowledging she needed "to make sure I'm caught up on it" before voting. "I apologize," sh…
About 14% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
### Meeting Overview The Whatcom County Council held a special meeting on Tuesday, March 31st, 2026, at 9:30 AM in a hybrid format. The brief 23-minute meeting addressed two agenda items: an ordinance on employee defense and indemnification, and a resolution on criminal justice sales tax priorities. ### Key Terms and Concepts **Defense and Indemnification:** The county's obligation to provide legal defense and financial protection to employees when they're sued for actions taken in their official capacity while acting in good faith. **Risk Pool:** The Washington State risk pool is an insurance arrangement where multiple government entities share the costs and risks of potential lawsuits against their employees. **Reservation of Rights:** A legal mechanism that allows the county to later seek reimbursement of defense costs if a court determines the employee was not acting in good faith or within the scope of their duties. **Criminal Justice Sales Tax (RCW 82.14.345):** A state law that allows counties to impose an additional 0.1% sales tax specifically for criminal justice purposes, generating approximately $7 million annually for Whatcom County. **Advisory Vote:** A non-binding ballot measure that allows voters to express their preference on an issue, giving elected officials guidance while retaining final decision-making authority. **AB (Agenda Bill):** The numbering system used by Whatcom County for legislative items brought before the Council. **Hold vs. Table:** Parliamentary procedure distinction where "hold" typically means postponing to a specific future date, while "table" means postponing indefinitely. ### Key People at This Meeting | Name | Role / Affiliation | |---|---| | Barry Buchanan | Council Chair | | Elizabeth Boyle | Council Member | | Ben Elenbaas | Council Member (sponsor of AB 2026-233) | | Kaylee Galloway | Council Member | | Jessica Rienstra | Council Me…
About 50% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing

Tags & Connections

Government Operations AB 2026 233 AB 2026 257 Washington State Risk Pool Whatcom County Council Barry Buchanan Ben Elenbaas Elizabeth Boyle Jessica Rienstra Jon Scanlon Kaylee Galloway Kimberly Tilling Mark Stremler Budget Finance Criminal Justice Government Operations