Search toggle

What's our vision?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What kind of facilities do we have?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What's our working hours?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

Real Briefings

City of Bellingham — Planning Committee (City Council Standing Committee)

MEETING-2026-05-11 May 11, 2026 Committee Meeting City of Bellingham 30 min
← Back to All Briefings
May
Month
11
Day
30
Min
Published
Status

The Bellingham City Council's Planning Committee convened on May 11, 2026, for a single-item afternoon session focused on Agenda Bill 24929: a resolution that would create a limited-term advisory work group to study and make recommendations regarding the city's landlord and tenant programs. The committee — chaired by Council Member Hollie Huffman and joined by Council Members Lisa Anderson and Michael Lilliquist — received a staff presentation, engaged in substantive discussion about the work group's proposed membership composition, and considered an amendment before ultimately tabling the amendment for further language refinement. The proposed work group, called for in Mayor Lund's 2024 Housing Executive Order, would operate for approximately one year with nine to thirteen members representing tenants, landlords, and community members with lived and professional experience in rental issues. The city's rental registration and property inspection program — established in 2015 — currently has 22,578 registered rental units, and more than 50 percent of Bellingham residents are renters, a context staff cited to explain the urgency of the initiative. The most substantive debate centered on the work group's membership makeup. Council Member Anderson raised concern that if the four flexible seats (above the nine-member minimum) were filled predominantly by landlord representatives, landlord voices would constitute more than 50 percent of the group. Staff acknowledged the concern and committed to maintaining equitable balance in the selection process. Council Member Anderson subsequently moved to amend the resolution to designate at least one seat for an income-constrained individual — someone receiving housing assistance such as a Section 8 voucher or Bellingham Housing Authority subsidy. Council Member Lilliquist supported the spirit of the proposal but raised a practical concern: that people currently in subsidized housing may have difficulty volunteering due to time

**AB 24929 — Resolution Creating a Limited-Term Landlord-Tenant Advisory Work Group** - **Action:** No final vote taken in committee. Amendment motion tabled unanimously pending language revision by staff; to be brought forward at the evening full Council meeting. - **Vote on tabling:** All in favor, no opposition or abstentions recorded in transcript. - **Staff Recommendation:** Adopt the resolution creating a 9–13 member advisory work group operating for approximately one year. - **Proposed Amendment (Anderson, tabled):** Add language to the tenant experie…

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Landlord-Tenant Advisory Work Group — Purpose and Structure** The city's rental registration and property inspection program, established in 2015, oversees 22,578 registered rental units in Bellingham. In recent years, the city has added requirements to support fair, affordable, and accessible rental housing. Staff framed AB 24929 as consistent with Mayor Lund's 2024 Housing Executive Order and with the Bellingham Plan's commitments to community representation in city decision-making. The proposed work group would operate for approximately one year with 9 to 13 members. The minimum nine seats are divided across three categories: at least four residents who are current tenants (including students in off-campus housing), at least three residents with landlord experience, and at least one person with community connections. The remaining four flexible seats — which would bring the total to 13 — do not have assigned categories, and the resolution as introduced does not specify how those seats would be allocated. Staff expressed an intention to balance large property management representatives with small independent landlords among the landlord seats. Planning and Community Development Director Blake Ryan (referred to as "Blake Lion" and "Mr. Lion" in several transcript passages — see Module 6) noted that applicants may hold overlapping identities and that categories are not strictly mutually exclusive; for example, a tenant might also have legal experience. **Membership Equity Concerns** Council Member Anderson's central concern was the ratio of landlord to tenant voices. She noted that if all four flexible seats were filled by individuals with landlord experience, landlord-aligned voices would constitute more than 50 percent of the group. She asked for assurance that the flexible seats would be filled equitably. Staff acknowledged the concern as valid and indicated the makeup would be shaped by applicants but guided by equity principles. Council Member Lilliquist noted that the three membership categories (A through C) are not exclusive — a single person may qualify in multiple categories — and suggested this cross-classification reduces the risk Anderson described. Lilliquist also called for age diversity in the applicant pool, characterizing it as a comment rather than a motion. **Income-Constrained Representation** Council Member Anderson's proposed amendment sought to require that at least one of the four tenant seats be held by an income-constrained individual — broadly defined as someone receiving housing assistance below 80 or 60 percent AMI, including Section 8, Bellingham Housing Authority programs, or other subsidized housing. Her rationale was that their "lens of what's happening in the rental" market is a critical voice, and that without a formal motion, such representation might not materialize. Council Member Lilliquist supported the goal but raised a practical concern: low-income residents may lack the time to volunteer, and the housing …
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Council Member Hollie Huffman (Committee Chair)** Presided over the session. Provided introductory context on the resolution. Responded to Anderson's concern about equity in the flexible four seats by noting that flexibility was intentional — the mayor and council would make decisions as applications come in, and Anderson's comments would be used as feedback during applicant consideration. Acknowledged Anderson's motion practice as consistent with retreat guidance. **Council Member Lisa Anderson** Supportive of the work group generally; expressed concern about membership balance. Moved to amend the resolution to require at least one income-constrained tenant representative. Explained the amendment as consistent with a council retreat commitment to codify priorities via motion rather than informal suggestion. Acknowledged practical recruitment challenges but argued that a formal motion creates accountability and obligates outreach. Tabled the amendment at the end of the session to allow staff to return with cleaner language for the evening. **Council Member Michael Lilliquist** Supportive of the work group and the income-constrained inclusion goal. Offered a technical refinement — suggesting "currently or previously" in subsidized housing — to improve recruitment feasibility. Separately raised a longstanding request for technical fixes to renter notification requirements, distinguishing those from broader policy work, and asked staff to advance them through an appropriate channel. **Council Member Jace Cotton (non-committee)** Observed but participated when invited. Expressed support for representation from affordable housing operators. Suggested intentional outreach — rather than a designated seat — as the better mechanism for ensuring that representation. Stated he would not support the motion as w…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Council Member Lisa Anderson, on the concern about landlord-heavy membership in the flexible seats:** "My main concern would be if uh those additional four were all um landlord experience, then the ratio would be above a 50% and so wouldn't it be necessarily representative across the board of area of interest. So I would just like some kind of assurance that um it's still going to be there's going to be equitability in those additional four should additional ones get selected." **Council Mem…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

- **This evening (May 11, 2026):** AB 24929 is expected to come before the full City Council at the regular evening meeting. Council Member Anderson committed to bringing a revised motion forward at that session, incorporating language staff develops to designate one seat for an income-constrained renter, contingent on staff returning with specific language. - **Ongoing — Renter Notification Technical Fixes:** Council Member Lilliquist requested that staff confirm whether the previously proposed technical fixes to renter notification requirements should be advanced as a standalone ordinance or deferred to the advisory work group. A conversation between Lilliquist and Director Ryan is expected to clarify the pathway. Director Ryan …

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Before this meeting:** AB 24929 was a staff-drafted resolution creating a 9–13 member landlord-tenant advisory work group with three membership categories (tenant experience, landlord experience, community connection). No explicit requirement for income-constrained representation existed in the draft. No mechanism existed to ensure the flexible four seats would balance across categories. **After this meeting:** - The committee has formally flagged equity concerns about the flexible seat allocation. Staff acknowledged these concerns and committed to applying equity principles in applicant selection — a commitment that is now part of the public record even if not yet codified in the resolution. - Council Member Anderson's intent to require at least one income-constrained renter on the work group is now on the table as a formal motion, tabled pending language refinement. This is a materially…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing