Search toggle

What's our vision?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What kind of facilities do we have?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

What's our working hours?

When she reached the first hills of the Italic Mountains, she had a last view back on the skyline of her hometown.

Real Briefings

Bellingham City Council (Special Meeting)

BEL-CON-SPC-2024-08-02 August 02, 2024 Committee of the Whole City of Bellingham 91 min
← Back to All Briefings
Aug
Month
02
Day
91
Min
Published
Status

On the afternoon of Friday, August 2, 2024, the Bellingham City Council convened a special meeting at City Hall to host a joint Growth Management Coordination Workgroup — a roundtable discussion among elected officials from across Whatcom County focused on the upcoming 2025 comprehensive plan updates. The meeting was not a formal legislative session and no votes were taken. Instead, it functioned as an unstructured dialogue, the first of its kind in this planning cycle, among city council members, county council members, and representatives from Lynden, Ferndale, Blaine, Nooksack, Everson, and Sumas, along with planning staff and stakeholders. The conversation was framed at the outset by Council Member Michael Lilliquist, who clarified that while the City of Bellingham was hosting, the meeting was properly part of Whatcom County's ongoing comprehensive planning process. Council President Daniel Hammill noted that Bellingham's seven Urban Villages — comprising just under 4% of city land — are currently projected to absorb 30% of all future growth, a statistic that framed much of the tension in the room. County Council Member Todd Donovan pressed Bellingham representatives directly: does the city intend to annex any of its long-lingering urban growth areas (UGAs), and if not, how can planning staff be expected to model realistic population allocations? Multiple themes surfaced repeatedly: the inadequacy of planning based solely on historical trends; the mismatch between urban growth area boundaries established decades ago and current development realities; the need to expand accessory dwelling units (ADUs) countywide; the challenge of accommodating housing at all AMI levels when private development gravitates toward higher-income units; the constraints imposed by flood plains in Nooksack and Sumas; the tension between farmland preservation rhetoric and actual agricultural viability; water rights limitations in Lynden; and the question of how to align county-level zo

This meeting was designated "Information/Discussion" with no recommended motion. No formal votes were taken. The sole concrete outcome was an agreed-upon next step: **Agreed Action — Next Workgroup Meeting:** - Participants agreed to schedule an additional workgroup meeting on **August 29, 2024, at 1:00 PM** at the **Lynden City Annex**, to be hosted by Mayor Scott Korthuis of Lynden. - Proposed agenda structure: approximately 15-minute overviews on three topics (ag…

About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
Members only Sign up free →
**Council Member Michael Lilliquist (Bellingham City Council, Sixth Ward):** Framed the meeting as part of the county's planning process, not a city-led initiative. Called for pre-zoning UGAs before annexation, removing "ghost UGAs" (like the Geneva area in the watershed) from the planning accounting, assigning permanent supportive and low-AMI housing to cities rather than unincorporated areas, and coordinating on industrial lands while maintaining access to Bellingham's tax base from those uses. **Council President Daniel Hammill (Bellingham City Council, Third Ward):** Noted Bellingham's seven Urban Villages are expected to absorb 30% of future growth despite comprising under 4% of city land. Raised long-term questions about northern UGA development, the Alderwood annexation, and the boundary relationship between Bellingham and Ferndale over a 25-year horizon. **Council Member Lisa Anderson (Bellingham City Council, Fifth Ward):** Called for ranking Bellingham's UGAs by viability and cost, working with county planners to align county-side zoning with the city's future needs, and ensuring industrial uses are included in UGA planning so annexed land can meet employment as well as housing goals. Advocated for Bellingham to hold an internal city-level meeting before participating in small-group workgroups to ensure staff are authorized and coordinated. **Council Member Hannah Stone (Bellingham City Council, First Ward):** Called for a shared commitment on income-level housing allocation, noted Bellingham can and should take more growth, and asked whether a pre-September workgroup meeting was needed to prepare for the consultants' presentation. **Council Member Edwin H. "Skip" Williams (Bellingham City Council, Fourth Ward):** Participated in discussion; specific positions not prominently captured in transcript. **County Council Member Todd Donovan (Whatcom County, District 4):** Challenged cities — particularly Bellingham — to state clearly whether they will annex UGAs. Opposed placing population growth in unincorporated rural areas. Supported expanded ADU allowances, including on R2 parcels. Raised agricultural regulation concerns including wetland delineation, slaughter facility access, and ditch district permitting. Called for a functional, outcome-based approach to wetland regulation. Emphasized that comp plan goals mean nothing without policy implementation. **County Council Member Ben Ellenbogen (Whatcom County, District 5):** Argued for planning based on community needs and preferences rather than solely historical trends. Raised food desert conditions in Kendall/Maple Falls as a long-standing planning failure. Supported mobile home park zoning in future annexation areas, light industrial UGA planning in north Bellingham, Lake Whatcom watershed coordination, and wetland mitigation bank reform. **County Council Member John Scanley (Whatcom County):** Called for formal scenario modeling of population allocation options. Raised AI-assisted visualization tools. Proposed small-group workgroups on specific topics and offered to host a UGA-focused group. **County Council Member Kaye Galloway (Whatcom County):** Raised the aspirational vs. pragmatic question for the comp plan. Expressed concern about unimplemented goals from prior plans. Called fo…
About 49% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
**Council President Daniel Hammill, on Bellingham's Urban Villages and growth concentration:** "Bellingham has seven Urban Villages and they comprise just under 4% of the city of the city land's supply but they're expected to accommodate 30% of future growth." **County Council Member Todd Donovan, on Bellingham's annexation record:** "Your former planning director said it was a moral imperative to annex Alderwood and then it didn't happen and you left us twisting in the wind — so you're going…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →

- **August 29, 2024, 1:00 PM** — Follow-up Growth Management Coordination Workgroup meeting at Lynden City Annex (across the street from Lynden City Hall, closer to Grover). Hosted by Mayor Scott Korthuis of Lynden. Proposed agenda: (1) 15-minute overview on agricultural land policy (with Ben Ellenbogen participating), (2) 15-minute overview on industrial growth (possibly with Gina Stark, Port of Bellingham Economic Development, or Ken Bell), (3) 15-minute overview on UGA review (John Scanley indicated interest in hosting this segment); followed by 45-minute breakout groups (open attendance) on each topic; then 30-minute reconvening for summary reports. - **September 11, 2024** (time not confirmed) — Quarterly Growth Management Coordination Meeting with consultants. Agenda will include: update on draft EIS schedule; update on the Housing for All Tool (HAT), implementing HB 1220 (housing allocation tool for all income levels); update on 0-30…

About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
Before this meeting, the Growth Management Coordination process had been running through quarterly staff-and-consultant-led presentations, with the last meeting on May 8, 2024, and the next scheduled for September 11, 2024. There was no elected-official-only forum between those formal quarterly sessions. After this meeting: 1. **A new interim meeting was scheduled** — August 29, 2024 at Lynden City Annex — adding an elected-official workgroup session between the May and September quarterly meetings that did not previously exist. 2. **An explicit request was made of Bellingham** to state its annexation intentions clearly and before the September modeling session, rather than waiting for consultants to present projections first. This represents a shift in the order of information flow — elected-official direction preceding staff modeling rather than following it. 3. **"Ghost UGAs" were publicly identified as a problem** by Lilliquist, with a call to remove them from planning accounting early in the comp plan update cycle. Specific areas named: the Geneva/watershed UGA for Bellingham; an analogous area in Ferndale. 4. **ADU expansio…
About 50% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — sign up free to read the rest Sign up free →
null…
About 100% shown — premium members only Upgrade to premium →

Share This Briefing